Main results page       Management log-in      

---

WEDNESDAY (5-MAY-21)

Pair 1 NS - DANA AUSTIN / DOROTHY SCOTT
Place: 3, Percentage: 58.22%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	1: BRIDGET GUBBINS / NAN NAGLE	3NT N		7	-100	0	0%
Board 2	1: BRIDGET GUBBINS / NAN NAGLE	4 W		11	-450	0	0%
Board 3	1: BRIDGET GUBBINS / NAN NAGLE	3 W		7	200	10	100%
Board 4	1: BRIDGET GUBBINS / NAN NAGLE	4 W		10	-620	6	60%
Board 5	8: MARG LAMB / PAM HASTINGS	1NT E		10	-180	0	0%
Board 6	8: MARG LAMB / PAM HASTINGS	3 S		11	150	12	100%
Board 7	8: MARG LAMB / PAM HASTINGS	2NT W		5	300	12	100%
Board 8	8: MARG LAMB / PAM HASTINGS	2 E		7	50	5	42%
Board 9	7: PADDY WHITE / JUDY MCCOWAN	4 S		8	-100	10	100%
Board 10	7: PADDY WHITE / JUDY MCCOWAN	1NT E		6	100	7	70%
Board 11	7: PADDY WHITE / JUDY MCCOWAN	3 W		11	-200	2	20%
Board 12	7: PADDY WHITE / JUDY MCCOWAN	2 S		11	200	8	80%
Board 13	6: DEB LOCKIE / PRUE TROEDEL	4 S		11	650	9	90%
Board 14	6: DEB LOCKIE / PRUE TROEDEL	3NT N		9	400	10	100%
Board 15	6: DEB LOCKIE / PRUE TROEDEL	3 S		9	110	3	30%
Board 16	6: DEB LOCKIE / PRUE TROEDEL	3NT W		10	-630	3	30%
Board 17	4: RACHEL HAWKER / PIP HEARD	2 E		10	-170	10	100%
Board 18	4: RACHEL HAWKER / PIP HEARD	3 S		8	-100	3	30%
Board 19	4: RACHEL HAWKER / PIP HEARD	3 N		9	140	7	70%
Board 20	4: RACHEL HAWKER / PIP HEARD	2NT S		9	150	2	20%
Board 25	2: LIZ CRAWFORD / JO BARKER	2 N		9	140	5	50%
Board 26	2: LIZ CRAWFORD / JO BARKER	2 S		9	140	8	80%
Board 27	2: LIZ CRAWFORD / JO BARKER	3 S		8	-50	3	30%
Board 28	2: LIZ CRAWFORD / JO BARKER	5 W		9	100	10	100%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results